Something I wrote for my University indie magazine about '29' by Ryan Adams:
‘29’ is not like other Ryan Adams albums. There’s no stand out radio-friendly pop hits or songs that would be included in the soundtrack of The OC. This is the darker side of Ryan Adams. He has always had his depressing moments but they are sprinkled all through his back catalogue. Here he paints the places his grew up (the southern states of the USA) in this otherworldly light that makes them dirtier and more romantic than they probably are. Love songs turn into stories which turn into warnings. This is what ‘The Queen is Dead’ was to kids in the US. The British get to peer into bar room brawls. They get to go on journeys along dusty roads to diners who hold women with pasts murkier than the Strawberry Wine Adams’ warns us against. This album has a specific identity. It fuses country, punk and pop together, to haunt you with the same feelings you get from copious amounts of bourbon. It has burning self-loathing and depressed nostalgia and confessions of the emptiness from all of his lost loves. He manages to reach the heights of so many emotions but it’s the aura of bitterness that mutes it and stops the album from being too ‘woe is me’ and self-indulgent.
‘29’ is not like other Ryan Adams albums. There’s no stand out radio-friendly pop hits or songs that would be included in the soundtrack of The OC. This is the darker side of Ryan Adams. He has always had his depressing moments but they are sprinkled all through his back catalogue. Here he paints the places his grew up (the southern states of the USA) in this otherworldly light that makes them dirtier and more romantic than they probably are. Love songs turn into stories which turn into warnings. This is what ‘The Queen is Dead’ was to kids in the US. The British get to peer into bar room brawls. They get to go on journeys along dusty roads to diners who hold women with pasts murkier than the Strawberry Wine Adams’ warns us against. This album has a specific identity. It fuses country, punk and pop together, to haunt you with the same feelings you get from copious amounts of bourbon. It has burning self-loathing and depressed nostalgia and confessions of the emptiness from all of his lost loves. He manages to reach the heights of so many emotions but it’s the aura of bitterness that mutes it and stops the album from being too ‘woe is me’ and self-indulgent.
- Mood:
tired
It's such a disappointment. It was suppose to be for the others, the ones that were different, but had grown up a bit and were embracing the fact they were so much better than everyone else. That their musical taste was a sneering and beautiful two fingers up to everybody who wanted to conform. Now it's worse than heat magazine. Heat magazine knows what it is. It has opinions. NME is just bland, bland, bland. It's aimed at the sort of people who in 2 years will hate the music that is being called 'indie'.
The letters page are full of idiots who sound like the same person over and over again. And when someone has a differing opinion, they point it out and laugh. NME is made for the sort of people who are bullies. The sort of people who wish they were like whatever's coming off the assembly line this week.
NME used to be about making a great magazine for a specific group of people, but they've become a crowd pleaser. Like a band that makes a second album exactly the same as the first, hoping to rake in just as much cash. Their main priority is making as much cash as they can while Hard-Fi, Razorlight, Kaiser Chiefs and all the other bland, lifeless bands that are popular. And they may be popular for a little while. But NME know that given a couple of years, no-one will be buying the magazine. They've alienated the people that want to hear interesting, new music (who would have been a smaller but more loyal audience) for hipsters.
From even before Primark sold skinny jeans and the Daily Mirror were constantly following Pete Doherty around, NME was getting disappointing. If it wants to be a mainstream magazine, it can have it's 5 minutes of glory. But if it had stayed true to its own writers and fans it would still be in the hearts of the people that used to think it actually matters.
However this weeks had a nice glossy picture of Marc Bolan (currently in vogue due to a greatest hits album coming out) which is very lovely and may make its way onto my wall.
The letters page are full of idiots who sound like the same person over and over again. And when someone has a differing opinion, they point it out and laugh. NME is made for the sort of people who are bullies. The sort of people who wish they were like whatever's coming off the assembly line this week.
NME used to be about making a great magazine for a specific group of people, but they've become a crowd pleaser. Like a band that makes a second album exactly the same as the first, hoping to rake in just as much cash. Their main priority is making as much cash as they can while Hard-Fi, Razorlight, Kaiser Chiefs and all the other bland, lifeless bands that are popular. And they may be popular for a little while. But NME know that given a couple of years, no-one will be buying the magazine. They've alienated the people that want to hear interesting, new music (who would have been a smaller but more loyal audience) for hipsters.
From even before Primark sold skinny jeans and the Daily Mirror were constantly following Pete Doherty around, NME was getting disappointing. If it wants to be a mainstream magazine, it can have it's 5 minutes of glory. But if it had stayed true to its own writers and fans it would still be in the hearts of the people that used to think it actually matters.
However this weeks had a nice glossy picture of Marc Bolan (currently in vogue due to a greatest hits album coming out) which is very lovely and may make its way onto my wall.
- Mood:
cold - Music:Grow Grow Grow/P J Harvey
1. Obviously Klaxons should not have won.
2. Obviously either Bat for Lashes or Amy Winehouse should have won. There were a lot of good artists and as long as you weren't backing Klaxons or The View then you may have a millimeter of my respect.
3. Again they went for the most popular band who claim to be 'original' and, well, aren't really.
4. Klaxons reaction to it has made me dislike them. The annoying one was a cunt (not in a good way though). The little one was drunk and then started acting like a cunt (in a bid to get as much attention as the annoying one). The fit one looked tres embarassed. As did the other one that isn't always in photographs.
5. Klaxons music is still alright, and it's quite obvious that it really is about the album because their performance was terrible. And shouldn't the fact that a band cannot even equal the sound on the record, let alone better it (which is what they should be doing) be put into consideration?
6. The fact that The View were nominated, was that a joke or something?
7. I am not suddenly changing my opinion or anything. I've always had a little like of Klaxons, but they've also always been throwaway and inconsequential
to me. And they seem to be getting this rep as some sort of amazing band. When they're not really. They're just a bit of fun and when they fall from grace it's going to be badly.
P.S. What was with Klaxons thinking they were underdogs? Didn't their album get to number one? Haven't they been on a gazillion covers ofheat! NME? Are they shitting me?
2. Obviously either Bat for Lashes or Amy Winehouse should have won. There were a lot of good artists and as long as you weren't backing Klaxons or The View then you may have a millimeter of my respect.
3. Again they went for the most popular band who claim to be 'original' and, well, aren't really.
4. Klaxons reaction to it has made me dislike them. The annoying one was a cunt (not in a good way though). The little one was drunk and then started acting like a cunt (in a bid to get as much attention as the annoying one). The fit one looked tres embarassed. As did the other one that isn't always in photographs.
5. Klaxons music is still alright, and it's quite obvious that it really is about the album because their performance was terrible. And shouldn't the fact that a band cannot even equal the sound on the record, let alone better it (which is what they should be doing) be put into consideration?
6. The fact that The View were nominated, was that a joke or something?
7. I am not suddenly changing my opinion or anything. I've always had a little like of Klaxons, but they've also always been throwaway and inconsequential
to me. And they seem to be getting this rep as some sort of amazing band. When they're not really. They're just a bit of fun and when they fall from grace it's going to be badly.
P.S. What was with Klaxons thinking they were underdogs? Didn't their album get to number one? Haven't they been on a gazillion covers of
- Mood:
aggravated - Music:X's Are Forever/Scissors For Lefty
